Obama's overseas (foreign) contributors made multiple small donation= s, ostensibly in their own names, over a period of a several months leading up= to the Presidential election, some under maximum donation allowances, but othe= rs are aggregating in excess

Who is Behind Obama’s Curtai= n?

&= nbsp; Obama's overseas (foreign) contributors made multiple small donations, ostensibly in their own names, over a period of a several months leading up to the Presidential election, some under maximum donation allowances, but others a= re aggregating in excess of the maximums when all added up. Though foreign donations are illegal, the media seemed to see, hear or speak no evil. The countries and major cities from which contributi= ons have been received France, Virgin Islands, Planegg, Vienna, Hague, Madrid, London, AE, IR, Geneva,Tokyo, Bangkok, Turin, Paris, Munich, Madrid, Roma, Zurich, Netherlands, Moscow, Ireland, Milan, Singapore, Bejing, Switzerland, Toronto, Vancouver, La Creche, Pak Chong, Dubli= n, Panama, Krabi, Berlin, Geneva, Buenos Aires, Pr= ague, Nagoya, Budapest, Barcelona, Sweden, Taipei, Hong Kong, Rio de Janeiro, Syd= ney, Zurich, Ragusa, Amsterdam, Hamburg, Uganda, Mumbia, Nagoya, Tunis, Zacatecas, St, Croix, Mississauga, Laval, Nadi, Behchoko, Ragusa, DUBIA, Lima, Copenhagen, Quaama, Jeddah, Kabul, Cairo, Nassau(not the county o= n Long Island,lol), Luxembourg (A= uchi's stomping grounds), etc,etc,etc,

&= nbsp; Despite the evidence of dirty campaign donations, crickets chirped in newsrooms acr= oss the country. Obama paid out at least $2,250,000 to the SEIU, t= he Service Employees International Union - = the nation's largest labor union and the latest 'criminalized' org to be exposed in the Democrat scandal of enormous proportion.= And SEIU COPE-PAC spent $13,355,389.00 on behalf of Barack Hussein. Interesting enough; = The SEIU was responsible for getting out the vote in Ind= iana, Nevada, Michigan<= /st1:State> and Wisconsin. SEIU paid for door-to-door canvassing for Obama, voter identificati= on and registration. They also provided several thousand members to man phone banks all over the country.

THUG-IN-CHIEF = OBAMA ABOVE THE LAW: WILL ESCAPE MASSIVE CAMPAIGN FRAUD AND MONEY LAUNDERING=

This Smacks of Putinism. You mean to tell me the millions of dollars in illegal donations, credit card fraud, foreign and Arab money that has been documented will escape prosecution? Obama recklessly broke campaign finance= law and he escapes prosecution? I am asking all Americans, do you give a rat's = ass about this country and rule of law?

More than = half of the whopping $426.9 million Barack Obama has raised has come from small donors whose names the Obama campaign won't disclose. And questions have ar= isen about millions more in foreign donations the Obama campaign has received th= at apparently have not been vetted as legitimate.

Federal law does not require the campaigns to identify donors who give less than $200 during the election cycle. However, it does require that campaigns calculate running totals for each donor and report them once they go beyond the $200 mark.

Surprisingly, the= great majority of Obama donors never break the $200 threshold. =

“Con= tributions that come under $200 aggregated per person are not listed,” said Bob Biersack, a spokesman for the FEC. “They don’t appear anywhere,= so there’s no way of knowing who they are.” =

The FEC breakdown= of the Obama campaign has identified a staggering $222.7 million as coming from contributions of $200 or less. Only $39.6 million of that amount comes from donors the Obama campaign has identified.

It is the largest pool of unidentified money that has ever flooded into the U.S. el= ection system, before or after the McCain-Feingold campaign finance reforms of 200= 2.

<= span style=3D'font-size:36.0pt;line-height:200%;color:#FFCC00'>Which begs the question; who is the man behind the curtain of Obama Hussein?

&nbs= p; What was the October surprise on September 18, 2008? Did someone cause a r= un on Money Markets that began the snowball of financial troubles we now face?=

On Thursday at about 11 o'clock in the morning the Federal Reserve noticed a tremendous drawdown of money market accounts in the United States, to the tune of= $550 billion that was being drawn out in a matter of an hour or two. The Treasury opened up its window to help. It pumped $105 billion in the system and quickly realized that they could not stem the tide; we were havi= ng an electronic run on the banks. They decided to close the operation, close down the money accounts and announce a guarantee of $250,000 per acco= unt so there wouldn't be further panic out there.

&= nbsp; This is the day that the Atlanta banks ran out of one-hundred-dollar bills. But now stop and think of this: A $550 billion withdrawal from money market funds in one-to-two hours. I am convinced that this is what they took to the White House = and said to President Bush, "We have got a disaster, you have got to get on board with a bailout," which came later on in October, "you've go= t to get on board with this $700 billion, the TARP 1,"

&= nbsp; If they had not done that, the estimation was that by two o'clock= that afternoon, five-and-a-half trillion dollars would have been drawn out of the money market system of the United States, it would have collapsed the entire economy of the United States, and within 24 hours the world economy would h= ave collapsed. It would have been the end of our economic system and our political system as we know it. We're really no better off today than= we were then because we've had a decrease in the equity positions of banks bec= ause other assets are going sour by the moment.

&= nbsp; We know that last fall, the Federal Reserve lent $2 trillion to somebody or a series of somebody’s, and we still don't know where it went. We know last year that we had a crisis on our hands and everybody was saying i= f we didn't do this bailout today the country was finished and they panicked Bus= h to get on board, they got Paulson on board. Obviously this kind of news,= if somebody from the Fed shows up and Bernanke and Paulson say, "Hey, we = have a chance of losing five-and-a-half trillion dollars if we don't do something,"

&= nbsp; Yet; who orchestrated this collapse and why? Chi= na, Russia, George Soros? The why in this conundrum is self evident, “a gimme if = you will”. A financial foreign behemoth orches= trated the monetary meltdown to insure the election of one of their own. And the s= heik puppeteer pulling the strings was no other than King Abdullah bin Abdul Aziz al-Saud of Saudi Ara= bia. You might remember he was the one who Obama prostrated himself to and did everything but offer to press and starch his robes.

&= nbsp; Think about it; were we to completely collapse, so would China, Russia and as fil= thy rich as Soros may be, even that dastardly Dan hasn’t the wealth to pu= ll something like this off. No; it was the house of Saud. For after all; despi= te Barry’s denials he is a Muslim, he was born in Kenya, “as stated by his grandmother’ and as the best indicator of his faith one need observe his treatment of Israel.

        &= nbsp; As quoted in the Washington Times, “President Obama's efforts to curb the spread of nuclear weapons thre= aten to expose and derail a 40-year-old secret U= .S. agreement to shield Israel's nuclear weapons from international scrutiny, former and current U.S. and Israeli officials and nuclear specialists say”.=

Israel's Arab neighbors grasp what the Obama administration won't<= /b>

<= /b>

    &nbs= p;     It is a strange situation when Egypt and Jordan feel it nec= essary to defend Israel against American criticism. But this is the situation in which we find ourselves today. Secretary of State, “Hilary Rodham Pantsuit” recently warned that Israel would not have American support for an attack on Iranian nuclear facilities= .

The Los Angeles Times reports: “The Obama administration, already on treacherous political ground because of its outr= each to traditional adversaries such as Iran and Cuba= , has opened the door, “a crack” to engagement with the militant group Hamas.

          The Palestinian group is designated by the U.S. government as a terrorist organization and under law may not receive federal aid.

But the administr= ation has asked Congress for minor changes in U.S. law that would permit ai= d to continue flowing to Palestinians in the event Hamas-backed officials become part of a unified Palestinian government. However; the Administration has quietly begun to transfer aid from the west bank Palestinians to Gaza held Hamas&#= 8221;.

          This makes perfect sense, provided we assume Obama to be a dyed in the wool Islamic radical. Why should we be surprised? When looking to the extremist Obama spent his formative years wi= th.

          What we ha= ve residing at 1600 Pennsylvania avenue is a true Manchurian candidate; follow= ing the direction of the Saudis with dual goals of destroying the great Satin, “the United States” and the little Satin, “Israel. <= /o:p>

          As further proof; not that my case is refutable, I offer for your consideration the si= tuation in Pakistan. Barry Hussein convinced the Pakistani government to offer the Taliban the <= st1:State w:st=3D"on">northern province of Punjab<= /st1:place> as a gesture of reconciliation. Ironically; this province was the optimal geographic area to mount an attack on its strategic advance to Islamabad.

          Today, the Taliban has pushed to within sixty miles of the capitol city and; as should= be noted, the densest population of the countries nuclear weapons.<= /span>

        &= nbsp; What should be noted; and this is of import. We know that Obama attended a Madra= sah in Indonesia as a young man. Under Islamic law only Muslims are allowed to attend these religious factories of hate. And, we also know that the penalty for convert= ing from Islam to Christianity is death. One might remember Salman Rushdie and = the fatwa sentencing him to death for such a conversion. Yet; no edict from Isl= amic clerics has been forthcoming for Mohamed Barry Hussein. <= /b>

        &= nbsp; These are dangerous times for America. And the man with his hand on our collective tiller, under his control, inte= nds to destroy this country with stealth and a teleprompter. He intends not onl= y to allow the destruction of our ally, “<= st1:place w:st=3D"on">Israel” he has chosen h= is adopted country for the final solution.

Als= o; after a great deal of study an analysis I would postulate this; we have participated in our last Presidential election. We are passively watching t= his government move at lightning speed to nationalize as much of the private economy as possible. As we watch, the Bamster is criminalizing his political opponents; A move reminiscent of Adolph Hitler or a BANANA REPUBLIC.

        &= nbsp; Obama is preparing this country for the fourth Reich. And we are about to learn a lesson of biblical proportions. That is; “when you dance with the dev= il, the devil doesn’t change, he changes you”. America is on the pa= th to a change we will never recover from and like the third Reich, it will on= ly require one demigod, gifted at reading a teleprompter and holding an abiding allegiance to Islam. God help us all.

Con= servative Springfield Staff Writer